<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BT Exact IPv6 Tunnel Broker is back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bishnet.net/tim/blog/2006/03/23/bt-exact-ipv6-tunnel-broker-is-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bishnet.net/tim/blog/2006/03/23/bt-exact-ipv6-tunnel-broker-is-back/</link>
	<description>"For a moment, nothing happened. Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen." -- HHGTTG</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:29:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.bishnet.net/tim/blog/2006/03/23/bt-exact-ipv6-tunnel-broker-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bishnet.net/tim/blog/2006/03/23/bt-exact-ipv6-tunnel-broker-is-back/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a read about 6to4 and in principle it looks like a flexible solution. The only thing I don&#039;t like is that it&#039;s tied to your IPv4 address, which means if you change IP for any reason your IPv6 address changes too.

With a tunnel broker you don&#039;t get that. But, the downside of using a broker, as I&#039;ve discovered, is that you&#039;re entirely dependent on one point of access, whilst with 6to4 you&#039;re not.

What I&#039;d really like is some way of an IPv6 range being allocated to me that I could then route without using a single broker. I guess that&#039;s not going to be possible until I can at least get native IPv6 to my router.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a read about 6to4 and in principle it looks like a flexible solution. The only thing I don&#8217;t like is that it&#8217;s tied to your IPv4 address, which means if you change IP for any reason your IPv6 address changes too.</p>
<p>With a tunnel broker you don&#8217;t get that. But, the downside of using a broker, as I&#8217;ve discovered, is that you&#8217;re entirely dependent on one point of access, whilst with 6to4 you&#8217;re not.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d really like is some way of an IPv6 range being allocated to me that I could then route without using a single broker. I guess that&#8217;s not going to be possible until I can at least get native IPv6 to my router.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.bishnet.net/tim/blog/2006/03/23/bt-exact-ipv6-tunnel-broker-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bishnet.net/tim/blog/2006/03/23/bt-exact-ipv6-tunnel-broker-is-back/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>... that is, in theory you can get it set up automatically, but having tried I haven&#039;t been able to get it to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; that is, in theory you can get it set up automatically, but having tried I haven&#8217;t been able to get it to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.bishnet.net/tim/blog/2006/03/23/bt-exact-ipv6-tunnel-broker-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bishnet.net/tim/blog/2006/03/23/bt-exact-ipv6-tunnel-broker-is-back/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using 6to4 these days, which gives you an IPv6 range based on your IPv4 address (2002:ipv4:addr::), and is pretty trivial to set up; it&#039;s anycast-based so it should find a nearby router automatically. I haven&#039;t played with reverse delegation yet, but it looks like you can get it set up automatically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using 6to4 these days, which gives you an IPv6 range based on your IPv4 address (2002:ipv4:addr::), and is pretty trivial to set up; it&#8217;s anycast-based so it should find a nearby router automatically. I haven&#8217;t played with reverse delegation yet, but it looks like you can get it set up automatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

