Archive for the ‘Finance’ Category

Petition: Savings account summary box

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 in Finance

Martin Lewis, of moneysavingexpert.com, has launched a petition on the Number 10 government petition site. He’s petitioning the Prime Minister to mandate savings account providers to include the current interest rates on every statement.

I think this is a worthy cause. Recently I’ve been trying to find the rates of my savings accounts and it’s certainly not as easy as it should be. It gets particularly tricky when a provider has multiple accounts with similar names, often the same account but different issues. Working out which you have can take some time.

So, if you agree please take a moment to sign the petition.

Thanks!

  • Share/Bookmark

UK Bank Rate cut to 0.5%

Thursday, March 5th, 2009 in Finance

Today the Bank of England cut the bank rate (commonly known as the interest rate) to 0.5%, the lowest value ever recorded. They also plan to inject more money in to the system to try and get the economy going again. The governor said this policy would “eventually work”.

Now I get the reasons behind this. The economy worldwide is in a bad state at the moment and governments are forced to make tough choices to try and rectify things. But I’m selfish, and all I see is that the interest on my savings will be reduced yet again.

I’m in the position of many people these days. House prices were soaring and getting that first step on to the housing ladder was hard. So, we took the decision to rent instead of buy and to save our money for a future house deposit. This worked well when rates were high; we had no expensive mortgage to pay and our savings were working hard for us (although, inflation meant that looked better than it really was).

But now after numerous rate cuts we’re seeing no benefit, we’re just seeing our monthly interest payments dwindle. Looking back 12 months I think we were earning roughly 3 times what we are now. That’s a huge drop! Fortunately we don’t depend on the interest to live, but I feel sorry for those that do.

This has led me, and many others, to start searching for better ways to invest our money. For short to medium term maybe corporate or government bonds are a good choice? Whilst equities are likely still the best long term choice. Maybe Zopa is good for medium term as well. But these all bring risk, and now probably isn’t the time to gamble with your savings (at least not all of it).

Next month brings the start of the next tax year. We’re already starting to see some attractive cash ISA deals, so come April I’ll be hunting out the best deals for our money – I’ll be sure to post the results!

So where does this leave rates now? Hopefully this will be the lowest they can go. Is it actually possible they’ll drop to 0.25% or even 0%? Will banks start charging savers rather than paying interest? Time will tell…

  • Share/Bookmark

Statutory Credit Reports 2009

Sunday, March 1st, 2009 in Finance

A couple of years ago I wrote about my first experience getting statutory credit reports. At the time I said I’d do them on a bi-yearly basis, so a week ago I decided to do them again.

The process is the same as before. The credit referencing agencies, Experian, Equifax and Callcredit, have a statutory obligation to provide you with your credit report. They are allowed to charge a £2 fee, which I presume is to cover the admin cost of producing the report. The process isn’t as easy as it could be – all three agencies have premium services which provide analysis of the report, so they’d prefer you did that instead. Consequently, it can take a few minutes to find out how to request the statutory one.

So to make life easier here are the current links as of February 2009:

Why would you want to do this? There are a few reasons I can think of:

  1. You’re about to apply for credit, or have recently been refused credit, and want to check the information the credit issuer has access to.
  2. You’re concerned about identity theft and want to make sure there’s no credit in your name that you don’t know about.
  3. You just want to check that the information held about you is correct.

I fall in to the last category. Thankfully all was in order this year – the only surprise was that I was already linked to my wife’s credit report. It turns out applying for a joint bank account creates an association between you – that was news to me! Fortunately we both have good credit histories.

As a closing comment I’d like to remind readers that the data they hold about you is yours, and you have a right to see it. Financial institutions would have you believe this is their data and that it’s for their eyes only, but don’t be fooled. It’s well worth the £6 to find out exactly what they’re looking at when you apply for credit.

  • Share/Bookmark

Questions about the Fidelity MoneyBuilder UK Index Fund (MT)

Thursday, February 26th, 2009 in Finance

Before opening a tracker fund I had a couple of questions about the Fidelity MoneyBuilder UK Index Fund (MT). They’re probably obvious to the seasoned investor, but I wasn’t sure, so I sent Fidelity an email to ask.

The first question was:

Is the fund an accumulation fund? If so, how do dividends get reinvested?

I was fairly sure what type of fund it was, but wanted confirmation. The second part was the bit I had misunderstood. I’d assumed it just meant that dividends, instead of being paid out, were automatically used to purchase new units. That’s not the case. Instead any distribution declared by the fund is reinvested in to the fund itself and therefore increases the value of every unit. So instead of getting more units, your existing ones go up in value.

The second question was:

If the unit price was £0.41 and I purchased £100 worth of units, I’d end up with 243 units worth £99.63. Where does the £0.37 go?

This seemed like an obvious question, but I’d made the mistake of assuming you can only buy units in whole numbers. It turns out that you can by fractions of units, so in the example above I’d get 243.90 units (I guess they round it off a little).

Note: I’ve not quoted Fidelity’s actual reply because it has one of those confidentiality clauses. Given the public nature of the answers it would probably have been fine, but it’s just not worth the hassle…

  • Share/Bookmark

Zopa

Monday, February 23rd, 2009 in Finance

Have you heard of Zopa? It’s got quite a unique name, it’s been in the press, and it’s been around for a good few years now, but most people I ask don’t know what it is.

Zopa is a peer-to-peer money lending site. What exactly does that mean? Well, it’s about bringing lenders and borrowers directly together. Banks have been doing this themselves for years, but with a huge void in between – you never know what’s happened to your money, only that you get a fixed rate of return, and that someone else is borrowing money, possibly yours. Zopa attempts to cut out this middle man and in return claims better rates for both lenders and borrowers.

What’s the catch? As with any scheme offering you more interest than a high street bank it’s more risky and involves more effort (not a lot, if you want to be lazy, but you can get heavily involved if you want!). By cutting out the middle man the guarantees to lenders are gone. You don’t put your money in for a fixed rate of return and wait for your income to appear. Instead, the rates can vary, and you’re directly exposed to late payments and defaulters (people who don’t pay).

Lets look at how it actually works. There’s two ways to lend on Zopa – the market place and listings. The market place is a place where lenders can offer money to certain categories of borrower (A* to Y, based on credit rating and/or age) at certain rates for a certain period of time (3 or 5 years). Borrowers then apply for loans (I’m not sure on this process because I haven’t done it) and get matched up with lenders by Zopa’s systems.

Zopa allow you to limit your exposure to each borrower. So when setting up your lending offer for the markets you can say to lend a maximum of, for example, £10 to each borrower. When the system matches up a loan for a borrower it has to use the offers from many lenders to build up a package. This is great for lenders since your funds are spread widely, which means if an individual borrower defaults the impact is less than it would be if you’d covered that entire loan yourself.

The other method of lending is called listings. These are more auction like – a borrower puts a listing up and gives details of their financial status and why they want money. Lenders can ask questions (publicly) about these details and can decide whether they want to make an offer. Offers are made for a certain amount at a certain percentage. When enough offers have been made to cover the loan the ones with high percentages start being knocked off the end. As the listing approaches its close lenders often fight to get their offer in at as high a rate as possible, which drives down the average rate (which is what the borrower gets). At the end of all this the borrower can decide whether to accept or not.

Personally I find the listings more fun than the market place, but in the long run the markets offer the best facility for lending. You can set your rates, turn on automatic lending (to automatically reinvest your returns from loans), and leave it to it. Rates would need reviewing on a regular basis, but that’s part of the fun of a system like this.

The next stage for loans from either system is the underwriters. This is the stage where the Zopa staff decide whether to approve the loan or not. They do a whole bunch of stringent checks which result in quite a large number of rejections. Whilst this can be frustrating it’s nice to know someone is taking the time to make the checks to safeguard your money.

Then the money is given to the borrower and the repayment process begins. Over the next 3-5 years (possibly less on listings, where the duration can be as little as 1 year) the money trickles back, including interest. The rates quoted do rely on reinvestment though, so it’s important to reinvest those returns (when they reach £10 blocks) to make maximum use of Zopa.

So what’s left to worry about? Bad debt and defaulters. It’s inevitable that a percentage of the borrowers will fail to pay or disappear. The spreading of money minimises impact, but it still happens. And worryingly the rate at which it’s happening seems to be on the up. Zopa is quite open about these figures, but they do seem to lag on reality, so take the numbers with a pinch of salt. If you stick to the higher end markets the risk is lower, but so are the returns. It’s a balancing act to decide how to set your rates against these risks.

Zopa is becoming increasingly popular of late due to the lower high street savings rates and the increasing difficulty in getting loans. I suspect this means more lenders are getting involved without fully understanding what they’re getting in to. The biggest issue I see is the longevity of the loans. You can’t get your money back for up to 5 years, and the constant recycling of funds means that’s a moving target. It’d be great to see Zopa doing a market place for existing loans where lenders can sell on their current loans, but that’s a whole new ball game, and I don’t expect they’ll do it any time soon.

Personally I’m probably not going to get seriously in to Zopa. It’s fun to play with and see how things go, but for now my savings will remain locked away in low paying savings accounts and ISAs.

  • Share/Bookmark

Starting out with investments

Thursday, February 19th, 2009 in Finance

Foreword: I’m new to investing so much of what I write may be incorrect or misguided. Please don’t take anything I say as financial advice.

For a while now I’ve been aware of the whole area of investments – shares, indexes, trackers, funds, corporate bonds, gilts, etc – but I haven’t yet dipped my toes in. After looking through the Foolish guide (a little dated, but still a good source of information) that’d been lurking on my shelf for a while I decided it was time to take the plunge.

Why now, given the current economic state? Well, that’s exactly why. Share prices are currently looking pretty attractive compared to where they were a year or so ago. Will things fall further? Possibly, but it’s quite likely (given past trends) that we will eventually pull out of this dip, and I’d like to be there to take advantage of that.

But, the main reason I guess is my age. I’m now 30, which means I’m not far off halfway to retirement! My wife and I both have pension schemes with our jobs, but it seems sensible to put away something extra. So I’m looking at the long term – we’re talking 30+ years. If I invest a regular sum every month for the whole period it should build up nicely by the time we retire, and we’ll be able to take advantage of pound cost averaging.

In this current climate I believe the most important investment to have is cash. Things are uncertain, so a buffer of a good few months salary is well worth having. We’ve been saving in to cash ISAs for a couple of years, so we’re OK on that front.

To start out my investment portfolio I’ve decided that an index linked fund will be best. It’ll make a good core holding, and I can add other holdings if I have some spare funds in future years. I’ll make a regular monthly payment and reinvest any returns (a Fool loves compound interest!). The FTSE All-Share index covers a broad range of the UK market, so something based around that seems like a safe choice.

The next question was whether to go with a passive fund (such as an OEIC – Open Ended Investment Company) or with an ETF (Exchange Traded Fund). There isn’t an ETF for the FTSE All-Share, but you can get something similar by combining the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 funds. So the important factor becomes the cost, and for that we need to look at the TER (Total Expense Ratio) for each fund.

First I looked at the Legal & General UK Index Trust tracker fund. It has a TER of 0.52% which includes an AMC (Annual Management Charge) of 0.50%. Then I looked at the Fidelity MoneyBuilder UK Index tracker fund which has a TER of 0.30% including an AMC of just 0.10% – they claim to be the cheapest UK tracker fund on the market.

Next on to the iShares FTSE 100 ETF. That has a TER of 0.40%, of which 0.35% is an AMC. The iShares FTSE 250 ETF also has a TER of 0.40%. So not much to choose between them? Lets look at the other charges involved.

It turns out that it’s usually free to pay money in to a fund on a regular basis (and probably for lump sum payments, although I’ve not checked). However, the same can’t be said for ETFs. The clue is in the name – Exchange Traded Funds. This means that these funds are purchased on the stock exchange just like you’d buy a share in a UK company. The downside to this is the dealing charges, which can be around the £10 mark for each transaction – not a big deal for large lump sum investments, but look out regular investors!

Crikey! If you’re investing £100 a month that’s 10% of your money being used up straight away. Fortunately, it’s not quite that bad. Most dealers seem to offer a package for regular investors with a special rate of around £1.50 per trade. 1.5% is looking much better – invest more than £100 and it’s even less.

So, lets compare. When we’re talking about TERs of 0.30% to 0.52% for passive funds, 1.5% (lets assume a £100 pcm investment for now) seems quite high, right? Yes and no. For the first year it’s reasonable to do a direct comparison, but in the 2nd year you’re only paying the 1.5% charge on the money you put in during that year. So, now it’s 0.75% to add to your TER. Year on year the percentage compared to your total fund decreases to the point where it’ll eventually become insignificant.

Another thing to consider is dividends. The passive funds usually have an option to automatically reinvest dividends, which is a good thing for the long term investor. The iShares ETFs currently don’t, so you’ll have to reinvest manually. Not a deal breaker, but worth noting.

My conclusion is that they’re approximately equal for an investor (please remember my foreword!). Which did I decide to go for in the end? I’m still deciding, but I suspect I’ll be opening up a Fidelity account and investing in their MoneyBuilder UK Index fund in time to get it in to this year’s ISA.

  • Share/Bookmark

Why not allow joint ISAs?

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009 in Finance

So I’ve been looking at money again lately, and I’m left wondering why joint ISAs aren’t allowed. And yes, before some smart arse points it out, I know that the I in ISA stands for individual.

I don’t know about other couples, but what my wife and I have is an ISA each which we fill up each year. So instead of one account we have two. As far as I can see there is no difference between this and a joint ISA; the tax benefits are identical. In fact, it means there’s a whole load of additional accounts which wouldn’t exist if joint ISAs were allowed.

I therefore put forth the idea for a JSA. A Joint Savings Account, with two holders, two NI numbers, and twice the benefits of an ISA.

Who’s with me? :-)

  • Share/Bookmark

Statutory Credit Reports

Wednesday, March 21st, 2007 in Finance

There are three credit referencing agencies used in the UK. They are Experian, Equifax and Callcredit. You have a statutory right to request a copy of the information they hold on you, for which you are charged £2. All of them offer full reports for around the £15 mark, but these just contain analysis and views on how lenders will interpret the information. There are times when a full report could be useful, but not for me at the moment.

I recently requested the statutory reports from all three agencies and they all showed up within a few days. Although they all contained similar information the Experian report showed that it was the agency lenders were primarily using to do checks with. It was interesting to see just how much information is contained in the report and how often you’ve had checks run against yourself. Did you know that some insurance companies do it when you get a quote?

So why would you want to do this? The main reason is to keep tabs on the information held about you and to check for anything suspicious. If someone has stolen your identity you might find things cropping up on your report that have nothing to do with you. They also give you the opportunity to find and correct mistakes, which is better than trying to deal with problems when a lender does a check on you.

For £6 in total it’s not worth worrying about the money, so I plan to get reports on a yearly or bi-yearly basis.

Hopefully this provides you with a little insight in to this area – I knew little about it until I went through this process.

  • Share/Bookmark